Radio Jackie News banner

107.8 Radio Jackie - Bulletins aired each hour

Thursday, 10 March 2016

Save Our Fairfield campaigners issue open letter to Croydon's councillors

The move follows an invitation to attend a public meeting about the issue of the closure of Fairfield Halls for two years from July, for refurbishment.

The campaign group says it has received no formal reply on the matter, and is intending to host a public meeting.

When we approached Croydon council for a statement about the proposed re-development, we were told to contact Fairfield Ltd, which we have been unable to reach.

Some listeners have told us, that they are still able to book tickets for concerts scheduled after the proposed closure date, and they are awaiting refunds.

Below is a copy of the letter written on Tuesday.

An Open Letter to Cllr Newman and Croydon Council.
From Andy Hylton ‘Save Our Fairfield’ Campaign.

Dear Cllr Newman.

Following my recent request for a public meeting to discuss the future plans for the Fairfield Halls development, I
have received no official reply from neither yourself or Cllr Godfrey. It is regretful that this issue was not seen as
‘major’ enough within the town to warrant a meeting, where local residents, community groups and staff would be
able to have their concerns addressed, in accordance with your commitment to 'openness and transparency’.
With seemingly no opportunity for public discussion or appeal, we are about to lose the Fairfield Halls by stealth.
Once closed, it is difficult to say for definite whether it would ever be reopened. Simon Thomsett the Fairfield CEO
has said as much, so have others in the entertainment and venue management industry.
Whilst I fully welcome the proposed £30m spend on this much needed refurbishment, I urge the council to rethink
the extraordinary decision they are taking to fully close it for at least two years, and to look at the impact on
Croydon that the closure will have. I have severe concerns at the council’s plans to close Fairfield Halls for two
years for refurbishment, rather than the phased approach which Fairfield Halls themselves and many others favour.
Fairfield (Croydon) Ltd have their own plan, which would cost a lot less than £30m, and will keep the venue open
for the community during refurbishment. The venue has been running at an increasing rate of success over the last
years and this continuity has allowed them to continue to reduce historic debt and bring down subsidy levels.
Due to the Mott MacDonald report being repressed, part of the problem here is lack of information, so I can only
hazard a guess at exactly what negative aspects of a full closure are contained in the Mott MacDonald report.
Let us look at the figures. The figure ‘thrown’ around of an extra £4.8m for construction costs from a phased
scheme has not been publicly verified. Then there is a supposed extra £3.2m of running costs during phasing on top
of that. How this figure has been calculated is not entirely clear, as to base this on current running costs of a fully
functioning building would not be correct. It stands to reason that if a large chunk of the building is out of use and
handed over to builders then there would be no running costs for that area, thus less utility bills, insurance
payments etc. Equally, less programme would require less staff. In the phased option the majority of redundancies
would be by choice,or natural wastage.
We do not know what the true costs of closing the building, making everyone redundant and then reopening from
scratch will be.
Re-staffing will be extremely costly, requiring specialist recruitment and recruitment consultants. Those staff will
require specialist training in some cases and at least a period to train in the venue itself. Remember that everyone
who currently works at the Fairfield Halls will lose their jobs in July.
If the venue is to be run by a commercial operator then there would also be no volunteer corps of stewards to
reduce costs and provide a community charitable connection. This volunteer corps is made up of men and women
from 17 to 93 years and was originally created before the Fairfield Halls were built in 1962. A detail of Croydon
history soon to be lost forever.
A huge marketing campaign would be needed to get the audiences back and a huge programming budget to get the
shows back. We don’t know how all this corresponds to the supposed £8m phased figure.
Could the closure and re-opening end up costing far in excess to tax payers that the costs of a phased development?
Is this giving tax payers value for money?
This needs to be debated in a public meeting so a clear understanding of the advantages/disadvantages s of both
approaches can be clearly stated. Only then can this be fully scrutinised and we will all be able to see what is
clearly in the public interests of Croydon.
What is the council’s operational plan and strategy for the venue when it reopens?
Given that orchestral programmes are booked often two years in advance - due to the commitments of the various
orchestras – surely you need an operator and plan in action from before the day Fairfield closes? Equally, fixtures,
fittings and equipment are essential to get right in a multi-function space like Fairfield. Only the operator can
know what is required and how it is likely to be used.
Then there are the practical questions. What is Croydon to do during the two year closure? What are the council’s
interim plans to replace the lost capacity of these three professionally equipped venues, and various smaller
As a casual technician at Fairfield Halls, I know many of the full time technicians are very sceptical both of the
designs themselves and of the works being completed properly so that the finished product is efficient and fully
functional. Many have contacts elsewhere in the industry, where refurbishments at other venues have left the
operational technicians having to patch up and create work-arounds for bad design or bad implementation during
the construction phase,due to lack of consultation with operational staff throughout the whole process until
completion. Many of these professionals fear that these works will proceed with no logistical operational minds on
hand to compliment the theoretical and ultimately less operational minds of the architects and theatre
consultants. This alone is a practical reason to favour a phased refurbishment to keep the knowledgeable staff on
Another major issue is thatFairfield trains up apprentices, further adding to the value it provides the community.
These apprentices will be half way through their courses and are very worried about how this will affect them.
Where will they go? Other theatres which may be able to take them are a much further commute for them and the
mere fact all this is happening is bound to affect their learning. Fairfield is a specialist venue, it can’t simply re-locate to a new location, nor can the staff be moved to another branch. The only option with full closure is full
redundancies – unless meantime activities are possible – and with redundancies in a place like Fairfield you lose all
the passion, knowledge and specialist skills to other venues outside the borough. It will be difficult to get them
You then have the loss of visitors to the town when Fairfield closes. Last year over 170,000 people went to ticketed
live performance events at Fairfield alone. That doesn’t include films or any other uses of the building apparently.
That would imply that there are over 200,000 visitors to Fairfield. Their input to the Croydon economy is £2m per
year according to the Fairfield Annual Report. If you phase the refurbishment you can maintain a good chunk of
this. If you close for two years that is completely gone. I doubt the remaining arts & culture venues in Croydon
could possibly get up to even a third of that figure whilst soaking up the lost capacity. Fairfield’s audience is
growing at the moment, they have momentum since they upgraded their box office and website. A phased approach
will keep the audiences in the habit of coming to Croydon to see shows. Closing now would lose all that. If the
charity closes then all the customer data goes with them. Again, adding to the costs of starting from scratch.
The building is perfect for a phased approach. The way it is designed helps split the three venues; Concert Hall,
Ashcroft Theatre and Arnhem Gallery. With work done during a much shorter closure, the electrics, water and
heating etc can be re-routed to allow each venue to operate independently. During this time essential works, like
replacing the boilers and removing asbestos can also be done. Much asbestos removal has already been done
without need for closure. Then, once that is complete, one or two venues can re-open whilst work continues in the
other(s) and then alternate over however long it takes 12–18 months per venue.
This is a true phased approach and this is why we need the full Mott MacDonald report published immediately, to
answer all these financial questions and show us what the negative side to the Council’s plans are.
Close down the Fairfield Halls for more than two years and you lose everything that has gone before. You lose the
people who are emotionally invested in it, the skills of the people who currently work there, the loyal audiences
who support it, the talented artists who play there. You lose the enthusiastic children and the schools who use the
venueto enrich the lives of their children and to teach our young people about cultural arts. Remember it wasn’t
so long ago that the streets of Croydon were burning and the venue has been home for many community events and
for disadvantaged young people. Fairfield Halls is not just about classical music.
Arts and culture are vital to a community’s wellbeing. We need it to lift us out of day-to-day life, to teach our
children about music and drama, to take out minds elsewhere. To challenge and to delight. At a simple level, all
this is provided, for example, by going to watch popular entertainment such as the pantomime each year.
Pantomime is often a child’s first introduction to a live performance, in a professional venue, with production
standards equal to any West End tour. This is true popular entertainment, drawing diverse audiences from across
the Borough and across all social classes and all ages.
Where will our children go to see a pantomime this year? There are simply not enough other venues in Croydon to
take up the capacity – and they do not have the facilities. The council would need to invest to bring them up to
scratch or even build a temporary venue and kit it out. All this eats into the so-called savings created by closing.
We already have a deep connection and strong cultural bond within the community and our schools. Two years is a
long time in a child’s development. This plan could see the Fairfield Halls closed for much longer. Please remember
that a whole generation of Croydon school children may have the very special access to culture and the arts at
Fairfield Hals, taken away from them, with no alternative plans offered.
Croydon Council, If you truly care about the children and the future welfare of this town, and you truly want to
revitalise the borough's cultural offer through this redevelopment of Fairfield Halls, I strongly urge you to please re-consider this decision to close the Fairfield Halls down.Let us keep music, arts and theatre alive at the Fairfield
Halls during a phased development, and put into action these exciting plans for the benefit of the current
population of the Borough, as well as for what the future years will bring!

Andy Hylton
Save Our Fairfield Campaign
posted by Radio Jackie News Team @ 12:20 pm  

Top of Radio Jackie News page here.

RJ Home button

One of many reasons why we are so useful to South West London... our very own news team bringing you stories that are relevant to you and your area.
If you have a press release or would like to send in news then pop off an e-mail to [email protected]

radio Jackie News Twitter
Follow Jackie News at

Listen to Jackie's latest News and Travel
Radio Jackie Latest News  Radio Jackie Latest Travel
News Team - - Local news 24 hours a day

news reader
Lucy Mayer
Lucy is the News and Travel Editor. Find out more about her on the Presenters page.

news reader
Luke Williams
Luke spends his free time playing synthesisers and watching old sitcoms. Journalism helps remind him of the 21st century.

news reader
Chloe Norman
Chloe presents both news and travel - find out more about her on the Presenters page.

news reader
Sandra Aggrey
Sandra wants to travel the world in 60 days.

news reader
Alex Loveridge
Alex loves watching tennis at Surbiton and Wimbledon and also plays a bit too. He swims at Richmond, but not in the Thames.

news reader
Mike Oban
Mike enjoys playing and watching sports and is a budding football coach.

news reader
Jacqui Kerr
Jacqui enjoys all sports and has had a go at most! She loves talking, current affairs, music, and walking her polar bear sized dog.

news reader
Emma Adams
Emma used to walk past Jackie when she was younger and wonder what it looked like inside. Now she knows.

news reader
David Walker
David´s philosophy is you only live once so go out and grab every opportunity no matter how small.

news reader
Deborah Martin
Deborah may have started life on a farm in Ohio, USA, but is a long time resident of South West London. Her current loves are fusing glass, good meals out, and dancing.

news reader
Paul Francis
Paul grew up in Fetcham and now lives in Teddington with his wife, two cats and a dog. He supports Fulham and plays in a band.

news reader
Sharmeen Ziauddin
Sharmeen lives in Worcester Park and loves lie-ins, kittens, books, politics, make-up and anything with sugar in it, but hates Monday mornings with a vengeance.

news reader
Nick O'Keeffe
When Nick isn't not on the airwaves, he's either in the kitchen creating magic, writing or travelling with his partner Mia. Devout Chelsea supporter to boot.

news reader
Will Sawyer
Most of Will's spare time is spent playing video games, but when he isn't doing that, he enjoys playing the piano, photography and cooking.

news reader
John Beesley
John lives in Hounslow. He enjoys beer and singing with barbershop quartets and choruses, though not necessarily in that order.

news reader
Emily Dexter
Emily is creative and has wide-ranging interests.

news reader
Amelia Beltrao
Amelia thinks living in New Malden definitely has its benefits: she gets the shops and beautiful riverside from Kingston, can walk her dogs on the common and visit the tennis in Wimbledon, as well as having a great range of Asian culture and cuisines on her high street.

news reader
Bear Hutchison
Bear loves to travel, listen to folk music and read. Her favourite part of South West London is the vibrancy of Clapham Common on a weekend - even in the cold winter, you can always spot some dogs or even a bit of quidditch!

news reader
Abby Chitty
Abby is from Southfields and her favourite band of all time is The Killers.

news reader
Nick Ellerby
Back in the UK after six years in Brazil, Nick is missing the sun. He's a big fan of cricket, stand-up comedy and all things radio.

news reader
Nimrat Ahluwalia
Nimrat is a coffee aficionado, self-proclaimed film critic and someone who is always updating their playlist.

news reader
Chloe Webster
Chloe joined Radio Jackie for the absolute non-stop bangers and is always keen to muck in and get her hands dirty, albeit with a bottle of hand sanitiser in the back pocket ready to whip out in these trying times.